Hormone therapy

Is HRT safe now? What the FDA actually changed

In November 2025 the FDA removed the boxed warnings from hormone therapy labelling. Here is precisely what changed, what did not, and what it means for a decision you are making today.

A woman at her laptop at home during a video consultation, writing down her questions.
The short answer

On 10–11 November 2025 the FDA removed the broad boxed warnings about cardiovascular disease, breast cancer and dementia from hormone therapy labelling. The endometrial-cancer warning on oestrogen-alone products remains. This reflects a reinterpretation of how the 2002 findings were applied, not a finding that hormone therapy is right for everyone.

What to hold on to

  • The change is real and it is significant. Most information published before November 2025 describes the old labelling.
  • The endometrial-cancer warning on oestrogen-alone products was not removed.
  • Timing matters: the risk-benefit picture differs substantially for a woman starting near the transition versus one starting many years after it.
  • Route matters: transdermal and oral oestrogen carry different clot and stroke risk profiles, and this is rarely explained clearly.
  • None of this makes it a decision to take from a website. It makes it a better-informed conversation to have with a clinician.

The short version

RemovedBoxed warnings on cardiovascular disease, breast cancer and dementia — from systemic and vaginal oestrogen products
KeptThe endometrial-cancer warning on oestrogen-alone products
Date10–11 November 2025
What it isA reinterpretation of how the 2002 findings were applied
What it is notA finding that hormone therapy is right for everyone

Why the warnings were there

In 2002 the Women’s Health Initiative reported findings widely communicated as showing hormone therapy increased the risk of breast cancer, heart disease and stroke. Prescribing collapsed almost overnight, internationally, and boxed warnings were added.

Twenty years produced a more complicated picture. Three things about that trial matter:

  • The women were older. Average age 63 — many more than a decade past their final period, and not the women who typically start hormone therapy.
  • The formulation is no longer standard. A specific oral combination that is not the most commonly prescribed today.
  • Absolute risk is not relative risk. The absolute risks were smaller than the headlines made most women believe.

What did not change

The endometrial-cancer warning on oestrogen-alone products remains, and that is not a technicality.

Oestrogen without progesterone, in a woman who still has a uterus, increases endometrial cancer risk. That is the entire reason combination therapy exists.

Nor does the change erase individual contraindications. All of these still matter, and some of them still rule it out:

  • A personal history of breast cancer
  • Unexplained vaginal bleeding
  • Active liver disease
  • A history of blood clots

The two things rarely explained well

Timing

The risk-benefit balance is materially different depending on when you start.

Starting near your final periodStarting many years after
Late forties, early fiftiesMid-sixties
The group the re-analysis pointed toThe group the 2002 trial mostly studied

Much of the confusion in public discussion comes from treating those as the same question. They are not.

Route

This is the most clinically useful fact in the whole area, and among the least known.

OralThrough the skin
FormTabletPatch, gel or spray
Passes through the liver firstYesLargely not
Affects clotting factorsYesLargely not
Clot and stroke risk profileDifferent from transdermalDifferent from oral

What this means for you

It does mean a great deal of what you will find online is out of date. Including on major health sites whose evergreen pages still describe a labelling position that no longer exists.

It does not mean hormone therapy is now recommended for everyone.

What to do with this

Read it, then take it to someone who can examine you and knows your history.

We have a one-page guide of the questions worth asking, built from what women told us their appointments were missing. It is free and there is nothing to buy in it.

Sources

  1. US Food and Drug Administration, hormone therapy labelling change, November 2025
  2. MedlinePlus, Hormone replacement therapy
  3. openFDA, structured product labelling for oestradiol
  4. NIH National Institute on Aging, Menopause treatment
Medically reviewed by Dr Ana Reyes
MD, MSCP, Menopause Society Certified Practitioner
Reviewed 22 August 2026
Updated 27 August 2026

The questions to ask your doctor

A one-page guide built from what women told us their appointments were missing. Free, and we will not sell you anything in it.

One email to deliver it, then a weekly note you can leave whenever you like. We never sell your address, and we never attach it to anything you type into the check or the assistant.